Welcome back, ManateeDan.

seacowsarereal.com

SEA COWS ARE REAL

Research

Underwater vs. in water wording for shallow cases

Started by NomenclatureUnit · 2026-06-05, 11:42 AM · 1,190 views

Posted: 2026-06-05, 11:42 AM#1

Tiny terminology thing but it keeps mattering, somehow, because words are a punishment.

When the hoof and lower leg are submerged, some members say underwater and some say in water. Outside readers hear underwater and imagine the whole animal below the surface, which is not what most reports mean.

Proposal: use submerged for body parts, in water for the whole subject, underwater only when the whole relevant subject is below the surface or the witness uses that wording directly.

This still leaves room for the land/water sequence without making us sound like we are hiding a scuba cow. before someone says it: no, scuba cow is not a tier.

water first. story second.
QuoteReply

Thread Replies

3 Replies

Posted: Yesterday, 1:44 PM#2

Use submerged for body parts. Use in water for the whole cow. Use underwater only if the witness wrote it or the image actually shows it. This seems boring enough to be correct, which means nobody will like it.

one valid meaning does not eat the other one
QuoteReply
Posted: Yesterday, 1:12 PM#3

Boring enough to be correct is the highest compliment a guideline can recieve here.

water first. story second.
QuoteReply
Posted: Yesterday, 12:56 PM#4

Can we add 'partially submerged' to the quick labels then? Because that is what people mean 80 percent of the time and what nobody types when excited.

if the route changed, write it down
QuoteReply

Quick Reply

Reply to Thread